Il giorno Wed, 26 Sep 2007 09:59:25 +0200 (CEST) Andreas Tille <tillea@rki.de> ha scritto: > On Wed, 26 Sep 2007, David Paleino wrote: > > > I don't really like CDBS, it's like a black box to me. I mean, you just > > include makefiles, and don't know what they're doing behind the curtains. I > > prefer debhelper makefiles (the "classic" debian/rules with dh_* calls), > > which let you define each action of the build process. > > ... > > Calling CDBS magic behind the curtains would apply as well to the > debhelper scripts: Why not using plain shell programming instead of > using those magical dh_* scripts? Those dh_* scripts are well documented in manpages, so you can easily access them while you're in shell. For CDBS, I haven't found any reliable documentation, only http://build-common.alioth.debian.org/ , but it seems like links are not working. Even the project's homepage on alioth has no documentation. I believe, however, this is a matter of tastes. For my packages I think I'll use debhelper, probably I'll learn something of CDBS when needed. > Kind regards > Andreas. Have a nice day, David -- . ''`. Debian maintainer | http://snipurl.com/gofoxygo/ : :' : Linuxer #334216 | http://www.hanskalabs.net/ `. `'` GPG: 1392B174 | http://www.debianizzati.org/ `- 2BAB C625 4E66 E7B8 450A C3E1 E6AA 9017 1392 B174
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature