On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 02:40:09PM +0100, Steve Kemp wrote: > On Sat Jun 30, 2007 at 18:43:36 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > > > I would like to know if it is OK that I orphan pscan and open a > > discussion about its removal. > > I think it would be grossly rude to attempt to orphan a package > which you do not maintain which has no bugs against it. (Except > the naming collision that is currently being discussed.) > > As the "newcomer" I'd suggest that the solution would be for > you to rename/move your binaries rather than forcing the previously > working packages to change their names/behaviors. > (Something I think you've agreed to do. Just sharing opinion.) > > pscan I previously maintained, use often, and would miss majorly > if it were orphaned and removed. Ack. Sorry for not answering earlier, but as the current maintainer of pscan I have no intentions to orphan or remove it. Thanks, Uwe. -- http://www.hermann-uwe.de | http://www.holsham-traders.de http://www.crazy-hacks.org | http://www.unmaintained-free-software.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature