Re: About the nexus libraries.
Ah ha! So that is why I could not figure out how to get it to read my
Nexus biological files. LOLOL!!!!! You can see that in CompLearn
version 0.9.8 and above I just wrote my own nexus parser rather
than use my own packages. . . that is why they were not ready
for prime time. I guess they may actually work but I wouldn't know
how to test them. I hope they are useful to somebody some day.
Now I finally have read the README and pieced it all together with
your help. As a scientist, I am happy to have packaged a scientific
package but strongly believe a certain library needs a renaming...
the scientific data file format library world is too small for two
different packages named Nexus. Hahahahahahah. Too funny.
thanks for the tip! cheers,
r.
On 5/22/07, Charles Plessy <charles-debian-nospam@plessy.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 21 May 2007, Rudi Cilibrasi, Ph.D. wrote:
>
> >Dear Andreas,
> >Thanks for your note. I have seen Debian Med out of the corner of my
> >eye for many months now and have been meaning to join one of these
> >years. I almost joined up with you guys because of another
> >proto-package available from my private website packaging the nexus
> >library [1]. This libnexus is not ready for prime time yet I guess
> >but would appreciate feedback, help, comments, etc.
Dear Rudi,
You are most welcome to join Debian Med. Programs like yours are very
useful to systems biology, and systems biology may some day give birth
to systems medecine. Data mining has its place in Debian-Med.
If you are interested in packaging such programs, we have a list of
software of interst on the Debian wiki:
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianSystemsBiology
I have an unrelated question about nexus. The url you cite is about
nuclear physics. Is it related to the Nexus Class Library?
http://hydrodictyon.eeb.uconn.edu/ncl/
Have a nice day,
--
Charles Plessy
http://charles.plessy.org
Wako, Saitama, Japan
--
Democracy is two wolves and a sheep deciding what to eat for lunch.
Liberty is a well-armed sheep contesting the vote.
Reply to: