Hi, I just submitted an ITP and tagged it. I discovered that this is still the only bug that is tagged this way. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=wnpp;users=debian-med@lists.debian.org I hope I haven't been to fast. Cheers, Michael On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 10:02:12AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Wed, 16 Aug 2006, Charles Plessy wrote: > > >In your revised version, you propose: > > > > user debian-med@lists.debian.org > > ... which is probably the reasonable part of my proposal. > > > usertag <bug number> + wnpp <cdd> <section inside cdd> > > ... which was mostly based on the example on > > http://wiki.debian.org/DebianScienceSponsoring#head-dd4c76d756afae474c2c9892c9221fd3277b3e80 > > >But the <cdd> is already given by the email address. It would make sense > >to mention it as tag only if all cdds were registering their tags under > >the same email adress. But in that case we can not have a debian-med > >specific tracking. > > It might be that I not really fully understand the usertag feature and > that it needs some tests but my understanding of the taggin is: > > user debian-med@lists.debian.org > usertag <bug number> + debian-med > > is just redundant but does no real harm. (Please correct me if I'm wrong!) > So my understanding ist that I could either do > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=debian-med or > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?users=debian-med@lists.debian.org > > with the same result. Is this right? > > >Or shall we run a cronjob somewhere which subscribes > >debian-med@lists.debian.org to each bug tagged debian-med for the user > >debian-cdd@lists.debian.org? > > This would not make any sense currently because I'm afraid we will be > the only CDD that makes use of this feature. Some people (perhaps only Ben) > in Debian-Junior had some attitude to tag their wnpp bugs but it became > quite silent in this area. > > >In the end, it depends on the level of interdependancy we want for the > >different CDDs... > > Well in reality we are in so far independant because not many people > follow the CDD framework but are busy how to produce their own live > CDs. (I have no problem if people discuss building live CD issues > in the CDD context but IMHO live CDS are a thing to have some fun and > to show off at exhibitions but are not the basis for real work and thus > should be only a small part of the CDD efforts. It more or less shows > that my idea to bring together people sharing similar ideas on different > fields not yet succeded.) > > >Apart from this remark, I think that it makes sense to tag ITP/RFP as > >wnpp + the name of the meta-package which could depend or suggest them. > > You are right here but my idea to leave the "med-" out was leaded by the > fact that also people from debian-science might search for "bio" or > "biology" but they would probably not search for "med-bio". Thus I > think leaving out the "med-" (which would be redundant if you are > seeking in the debian-med context (arked by email or tag debian-med) > would serve more than one purpose and helps other people as well. > > Please do not hesitate to correct me if I'm wrong. Perhaps > we should ocntinue this discussion on debian-custom list. > > Kind regards > > Andreas. > > PS: Apropos tagging: Even more important than tagging the ITPs would be > to start working on debtags. > > -- > http://fam-tille.de > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-REQUEST@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > listmaster@lists.debian.org -- GPG key: 1024D/3144BE0F Michael Hanke http://apsy.gse.uni-magdeburg.de/hanke ICQ: 48230050
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature