On Tue, 23 Nov 2004, Roland Marcus Rutschmann wrote:
Am Dienstag, 23. November 2004 15:48 schrieb Juergen Salk:DICOM. There are other tools (like (x)medcon, David Clunie's dicom3tools or dcmtk) that have always done a much better job on DICOM files for me.Yup noticed similar things. When I tested it only special formats did work uncompressed with standard header and no specialties in the file. Better take medcon to convert to png and then edit.
OK. So I'll just leave the "Suggests: imagemagick" which was just placed for general image processing which is IMHO the main purpose of this package.
(I haven't checked the latest ImageMagick version, though.)Same here
On the other hand it might make sense to file bug reports against imagemagick
if something fails as you reported while giving hints to code which does
a better job to help out imagemagick authors.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de