Unidentified subject!
<Eric.Bueschel@CEN.AMEDD.ARMY.MIL> Thu Apr 18 17:22:59 2002
X-Envelope-Sender: Eric.Bueschel@CEN.AMEDD.ARMY.MIL
Received: (qmail 9529 invoked from network); 18 Apr 2002 22:22:58 -0000
Received: from dasmthkhn459.amedd.army.mil (204.208.124.132)
by murphy.debian.org with SMTP; 18 Apr 2002 22:22:58 -0000
Received: by dasmthkhn459.amedd.army.mil with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
id <JFVPVDH2>; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 17:22:04 -0500
Message-ID: <6134D6233760B64586B40571833DA6A71FF7D6@dasmthfwa001.amedd.army.mil>
From: "Bueschel, Eric W RWBAHC DIN-PACS"
<Eric.Bueschel@CEN.AMEDD.ARMY.MIL>
To: "'debian-med@lists.debian.org'" <debian-med@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Dicom Toolkit and Library
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 17:20:52 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C1E727.4D007160"
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.7 tests= version=2.01
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
------_=_NextPart_001_01C1E727.4D007160
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
All,
I just read the announcment in LWN about your project. I am a PACS (Digital
Imaging System) sysadmin. I was very interested to read the current med
projects, especially the imaging related projects. I thought you might be
interested in a open source software package called DCMTK. It is a fairly
mature and very stable set of DICOM tools, including storage servers,
worklist servers, handling DICOM images, sending and receiving images, and
viewing/manipulating images. In other words the groundwork for a PACS
system. I am currently using it on top of Linux as way to burn DICOM images
to CD (we are trying to go completely filmless) as opposed to using film for
out of clinic reviews and it ties nicely in with existing commercial
applications (Radworks). I thought maybe your project could use this code
base as it looks like it would tie in nicely to what you are doing. It is
not GPL'd software, but I believe the copyright is GPL compatible and meets
Debians standard:
* Copyright of the software and supporting documentation is, unless
* otherwise stated, owned by OFFIS, and free access is hereby granted as
* a license to use this software, copy this software and prepare
* derivative works based upon this software. However, any distribution
* of this software source code or supporting documentation or derivative
* works (source code and supporting documentation) must include the
* three paragraphs of this copyright notice.
DCMTK can be found at:
http://www.offis.uni-oldenburg.de/projekte/dicom/soft-docs/soft01_e.html
Eric B.
------_=_NextPart_001_01C1E727.4D007160
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META NAME=3D"Generator" CONTENT=3D"MS Exchange Server version =
5.5.2653.12">
<TITLE>Dicom Toolkit and Library</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>All,</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2>I just read the announcment in LWN about your =
project. I am a PACS (Digital Imaging System) sysadmin. I was =
very interested to read the current med projects, especially the =
imaging related projects. I thought you might be interested in a =
open source software package called DCMTK. It is a fairly mature =
and very stable set of DICOM tools, including storage servers, worklist =
servers, handling DICOM images, sending and receiving images, and =
viewing/manipulating images. In other words the groundwork for a =
PACS system. I am currently using it on top of Linux as way to =
burn DICOM images to CD (we are trying to go completely filmless) as =
opposed to using film for out of clinic reviews and it ties nicely in =
with existing commercial applications (Radworks). I thought maybe =
your project could use this code base as it looks like it would tie in =
nicely to what you are doing. It is not GPL'd software, but I believe =
the copyright is GPL compatible and meets Debians standard: </FONT></P>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>* Copyright of the software and =
supporting documentation is, unless</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2> * otherwise stated, owned by OFFIS, and =
free access is hereby granted as</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2> * a license to use =
this software, copy this software =
and prepare</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2> * derivative works based upon this =
software. However, any distribution</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2> * of this software source code or =
supporting documentation or derivative</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2> * works (source code and =
supporting documentation) must include the</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=3D2> * three paragraphs of this copyright =
notice.</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>DCMTK can be found at: <A =
HREF=3D"http://www.offis.uni-oldenburg.de/projekte/dicom/soft-docs/soft0=
1_e.html" =
TARGET=3D"_blank">http://www.offis.uni-oldenburg.de/projekte/dicom/soft-=
docs/soft01_e.html</A></FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>Eric B.</FONT>
</P>
</BODY>
</HTML>
------_=_NextPart_001_01C1E727.4D007160--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: