Bug#1007143: mate-desktop-environment: in brisk menu desktop files arent shown if there are multiple categories written
Package: mate-desktop-environment
Version: 1.26.0+1
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: filipas.eduard@gmail.com
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
adding new softwer
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
i changed categorie section in desktop file
* What was the outcome of this action?
desktop file is shown in only one menu section
* What outcome did you expect instead?
desktop file shown in multiple menu sections
*** End of the template - remove these template lines ***
-- System Information:
Debian Release: bookworm/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 5.16.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/12 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=sl_SI.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=sl_SI.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled
Versions of packages mate-desktop-environment depends on:
ii mate-desktop-environment-core 1.26.0+1
Versions of packages mate-desktop-environment recommends:
ii atril 1.26.0-1
ii desktop-base 11.0.3
ii engrampa 1.26.0-1
ii eom 1.26.0-1
pn ffmpegthumbnailer <none>
ii libcanberra-pulse 0.30-8
ii mate-applet-brisk-menu 0.6.2-1
ii mate-applets 1.26.0-1
ii mate-backgrounds 1.26.0-1
ii mate-calc 1.26.0-1
ii mate-media 1.26.0-1
ii mate-notification-daemon 1.26.0-1
ii mate-power-manager 1.26.0-1
ii mate-screensaver 1.26.1-1
ii mate-system-monitor 1.26.0-1
ii mate-user-guide 1.26.0-1
ii mate-utils 1.26.0-1
ii pluma 1.26.0-1
Versions of packages mate-desktop-environment suggests:
pn mail-reader | thunderbird <none>
pn mate-desktop-environment-extras <none>
ii network-manager-gnome 1.24.0-2
pn x-www-browser | firefox <none>
-- no debconf information
Reply to: