Hello, On Sat 13 Apr 2024 at 12:49am +02, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > Hi fellow LTS contributors > > Today I started on bind9 and realized one thing. In bullseye the > security update is to release a new upstream version (released as > 1:9.16.48-1) instead of patching the old version > (1:9.16.44-1~deb11u1). For some reason the version used is -1 instead > of ~deb11u1. > > Since this is not the normal practice I'd like to check so we have a > common agreement that this is the best also for LTS/buster. > > In this case I think it is the safest method. Trying to pick the > individual patches can be risky. > Or do we know any specific reason why we should not go this path? I tried working on this a couple of weeks ago and addressed some questions to this list -- did you see my post? I hadn't realised it had been a whole two weeks since I'd posted. -- Sean Whitton
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature