On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 10:29:44PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > If we should have someone on standby we also need some procedure to detect > that this person should step in. > In principle we have a lot of people on standby already. I guess many in > the team could step in most weeks already. both of this could be solved by having a default 2nd person in charge aka standby. > I myself could have stepped in, but since we have no obvious procedure in > stepping in, and I did not want to step on anyone toes, I did not. no reaction for 24/36h => standby person is autmatically asked to step in. (we'd just need to define whether its 24 or 36 or whatever.) > So the question is, should we have some method of detecting an absent > front-desk? If we do, we should probably have it automated... no reply within 24/36: => absent front-desk. -- cheers, Holger ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ PGP fingerprint: B8BF 5413 7B09 D35C F026 FE9D 091A B856 069A AA1C ⠈⠳⣄ Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but not their own facts.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature