On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 09:24:48PM +0200, Otto Kekäläinen wrote: > > But what would be the point? You'd end up with a less-tested version > > of 10.3 compared to regular buster and if people need to move from > > 10.1 to 10.3, they can just as well upgrade to Buster. > > > > So, advise people to upgrade for anyone running the -server packages and > > keep the client-side tools/libs around? > I was just responding to Adam's and Holger's questions. But if telling > users to simply upgrade to Buster is an option, then what is naturally > the easiest route to take. well, one can certainly tell users to upgrade to buster, but we also want to support mariadb in stretch. not all users can upgrade... -- cheers, Holger ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ PGP fingerprint: B8BF 5413 7B09 D35C F026 FE9D 091A B856 069A AA1C ⠈⠳⣄
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature