[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

rules for regression updates in DLAs (was Re: [SECURITY] [DLA 1865-1] sdl-image1.2 security update)

On Sun, Jul 28, 2019 at 02:06:16AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> I don't think it's explicitly documented; I inferred it from these
> rules:
> 1. Corrections should be sent to the same recipients as the original
> incorrect information.
> 2. All messages sent to debian-lts-announce about package updates
> should be numbered DLAs.
> 3. DLAs that are related to prior DLAs should use the same first part
> and an incremented second part.
I wonder if we should put up these rules on


       PGP fingerprint: B8BF 5413 7B09 D35C F026 FE9D 091A B856 069A AA1C

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: