[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [SECURITY] [DLA 1865-1] sdl-image1.2 security update

> I don't think it's explicitly documented; I inferred it from these
> rules:
> 1. Corrections should be sent to the same recipients as the original
> incorrect information.
> 2. All messages sent to debian-lts-announce about package updates
> should be numbered DLAs.
> 3. DLAs that are related to prior DLAs should use the same first part
> and an incremented second part.

Sounds reasonable. Thanks!


                Hugo Lefeuvre (hle)    |    www.owl.eu.com
RSA4096_ 360B 03B3 BF27 4F4D 7A3F D5E8 14AA 1EB8 A247 3DFD
ed25519_ 37B2 6D38 0B25 B8A2 6B9F 3A65 A36F 5357 5F2D DC4C

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: