[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: LTS, no-dsa reasoning and sponsored packages

> If LTS is meant as Debian project, then I would suggest not to start
> to use those formulations, which I think are fine for ELTS, which is a
> dedicated project not on Debian directly. Saying something is not DSA
> worthy or is going to be ignored, because it's not used by a LTS
> sponsor will give a signal to others that indeed, Debian LTS is not a
> generic Debian project.

...not to mention that "Not used by any sponsor" is only true at a moment
t. Not necessarily at t+1. Sponsors might use new packages, new sponsors
might come or some might leave. Not sure we want to introduce such
uncertain information in the tracker anyways.

                Hugo Lefeuvre (hle)    |    www.owl.eu.com
RSA4096_ 360B 03B3 BF27 4F4D 7A3F D5E8 14AA 1EB8 A247 3DFD
ed25519_ 37B2 6D38 0B25 B8A2 6B9F 3A65 A36F 5357 5F2D DC4C

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: