[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: about 500 DLAs missing from the website

Hi Antoine,

On Sun, Feb 03, 2019 at 02:08:06PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Thanks for working on this.


> On Fri, Feb 01, 2019 at 01:44:10PM -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> > On 2018-12-19 18:05:36, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> > > The DLAs are visible here:
> > > https://www-staging.debian.org/security/2018/dla-1580

that one is also visible on
https://www.debian.org/security/2018/dla-1580 now \o/

> > > One thing that's unclear is how the entries get added to the main list
> > > in:
> > > https://www-staging.debian.org/security/2018/
> IMHO they should not be mixed into the same namespace as the DSAs.
> https://www.debian.org/security/ is very specific to the
> debian-security-announce list and contains items for e.g. contacting
> the Debian security team or referecing the respective FAQ.
I agree.

(Thus I think
https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/webwml/merge_requests/50 should
be cloded and not merged.)

OTOH I plan to review
https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/webwml/merge_requests/53 once
more and then merge it.)

> I think having a dedicated https://www.debian.org/lts/ where those can
> be collected and having further information on LTS would be somehow
> better.


> This will need an adjustment to the tracker side as well so that
> sources filed for Debian LTS DLA's will not link to
> https://www.debian.org/security/$year/dla-$nr .


> If a dedicated subpage is not needed and the only purpose is to link
> to a webversion, and the DLA's do not show up in the overall view then
> possibly the status quo is still okay.

I think it's ok for now / the current situation is an improvement over
what we had before, but we really want/need one a dedicated page like
https://www.debian.org/lts/ too.

On Sun, Feb 03, 2019 at 02:38:02PM +0100, Laura Arjona Reina wrote:
> Note that we already have some DLAs published in
> www.debian.org/security/YYYY, for the years 2014, 2015 and 2016. See
> for
> example:
> https://www.debian.org/security/2014/index
> I don't mind to move the already published DLAs to other place if
> people
> decides it's better, but I frankly don't know if/where these URLs are
> used/publicised (in Debian and maybe other places too), and we may
> need
> to setup redirectors from the current URLs to the new ones (no problem
> with that, I say it only to not forget, in case we decide to move all
> the DLAs to a different place).

right. we should do that and probably track this with a bug...


       PGP fingerprint: B8BF 5413 7B09 D35C F026 FE9D 091A B856 069A AA1C

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: