On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 11:44:45AM -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> But maybe, instead, we should just mark it as unsupported in
> debian-security-support and move on. There are few packages depending on
> it, in jessie:
[...]
> in buster:
> Note that the list is (slowly) growing.
marking it it unsupported in debian-security-support for jessie and
stretch might be the right step forward, but if if it's really as bad as
you describe, I think it should be kicked out of buster, instead of
carried on.
--
tschau,
Holger
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
PGP fingerprint: B8BF 5413 7B09 D35C F026 FE9D 091A B856 069A AA1C
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature