Re: the way to enigmail: gnupg 2.1 backport considerations
On 2018-11-20 12:55:16, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> All that said, i don't think that upgrading jessie to the versions of
> these libraries that are in debian stretch will break jessie. I do wish
> we had more substantive autopkgtest-style coverage in jessie, so that we
> could feel more confident about this, but i don't think we currently do.
So this goes back to the question of whether we should test this
further, either ourselves or through this list's participants.
I was hoping publishing the test package would trigger some feedback; it
didn't. While I can do some tests of my own, the surface area of this is
so vast that it feels somewhat pointless to run discrete tests.
What's the best way to resolve this?
A.
--
Blind respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth.
- Albert Einstein
Reply to: