I am looking at how we diverged from 3.3.30 right now and if it's worth
keeping our diversion.
Upstream explicitely said they would prefer us to migrate to 3.3.30 so I
will the advice seriously. :)
a.
On 2018-10-22 20:05:52, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> Hi Antoine
>
> My thinking was that it was easy to check how complicated a backport would
> be. If we conclude that it is complicated (patches do not apply and it is
> clear that code need to be re-written) then I think we can consider going
> for 3.3.30 instead. What do you think?
>
> // Ola
>
> On Mon, 22 Oct 2018 at 17:22, Antoine Beaupré <anarcat@orangeseeds.org>
> wrote:
>
>> On 2018-10-18 11:26:04, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
>> > Hi
>> >
>> > Sorry for the late reply. We can consider updating to the 3.3.30, but I
>> > suggest you first check how easy it is to backport it.
>>
>> What do you mean exactly? Backporting it is about as hard as figuring
>> out how hard it would be to backport, no? :)
>>
>> A.
>>
>> --
>> We will create a civilization of the Mind in Cyberspace. May it be
>> more humane and fair than the world your governments have made
>> before.
>> - John Perry Barlow
>>
>
>
> --
> --- Inguza Technology AB --- MSc in Information Technology ----
> / ola@inguza.com Folkebogatan 26 \
> | opal@debian.org 654 68 KARLSTAD |
> | http://inguza.com/ Mobile: +46 (0)70-332 1551 |
> \ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 /
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
--
Omnis enim ex infirmitate feritas est.
All cruelty springs from weakness.
- Lucius Annaeus Seneca (58 AD)