[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFC - ImageMagick, proper testing, and handling issues without a CVE ID



Hi Roberto

Yes that practice is a good thing. It keeps the mailbox small.
I do not really understand why Holger complained. I may miss something
obvious of course.

If anyone have a good reason why we should attach large files to the
list, then please let me know.

// Ola

On 28 November 2016 at 15:10, Roberto C. Sánchez <roberto@connexer.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 01:57:16PM +0000, Holger Levsen wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 06:44:07AM -0500, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
>> > > If you're asking for code review posting a debdiff to the list might
>> > > help people to pick it up.
>> > Quite right:
>> >
>> > http://people.debian.org/~roberto/imagemagick_6.7.7.10-5+deb7u7_6.7.7.10-5+deb7u8.diff
>>
>> this is a link posted to the list.
>>
>> this is not a debdiff posted to the list.
>>
>
> The debdiff is 262 KB.  I thought list etiquette dictated posting a link
> rather than attachment that large.
>
> Regards,
>
> -Roberto
>
> --
> Roberto C. Sánchez
> http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
> http://www.connexer.com



-- 
 --- Inguza Technology AB --- MSc in Information Technology ----
/  ola@inguza.com                    Folkebogatan 26            \
|  opal@debian.org                   654 68 KARLSTAD            |
|  http://inguza.com/                Mobile: +46 (0)70-332 1551 |
\  gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9  /
 ---------------------------------------------------------------


Reply to: