On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 12:25:32AM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > Hi > Maybe. However if someone is added to a users group that should really > mean that they should at least be able to read things, even though they > may not be able to write to stuff. So I actually think bash and others do > the wrong thing here. > The way I have done it is also more in line with upstream opinion, even > though upstream think it is ok for even anyone to read this file. > New simplified and with better comments attached to this mail. > Best regards There is likely a reasonable difference between files like .bash_history (which are meant to be used/accessed only by the creating user) and files which are possibly or likely to be shared amongst a group of users. This case seems to be of the latter form. Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sánchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature