On 01.08.2016 23:01, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 31/07/16 19:41, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: >> On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 07:34:28PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Currently, icedtea-plugin depends on icedtea-6-plugin, i.e. Java6. Given >>> openjdk-6 is unsupported, we should change it to depend on icedtea-7-plugin >>> instead. See the attached source debdiff (the control file is autogenerated). >>> >>> Thoughts? >>> >>> If no-one objects, I will upload that soon. >>> >> >> It looks good to me. > > Markus said on IRC that another option was to mark icedtea-plugin and > icedtea-6-plugin as unsupported. However, I think we should only do that for > icedtea-6-plugin, and update the metapackage to depend on Java7. Yes, it wouldn't hurt to update the dependency package icedtea-plugin. As far as I know it has no important reverse-dependencies though, for instance OpenJDk 6 only suggests it. So we could also just mark it as unsupported but I leave the decision up to you. Regards, Markus
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature