El 10/05/16 a las 09:17, Raphael Hertzog escribió: > (Copying debian-lts as the information here is of general interest to > LTS contributors IMO) > > On Mon, 09 May 2016, dak@security.debian.org wrote: > > Version: 2016.05.09+nmu1 > > Distribution: wheezy-security > > How come you reused the same version than in unstable? Now we likely have > two files of the same name with different checksums as the main and > security archives are separate... (*) Yes, it was a mistake. I tried to dcut it but it was too late. The package was finally rejected. I have just uploaded a package with a fixed version. Sorry for the mess! > > Also I don't think we should mark our uploads as NMU. The package is > basically co-maintained by the security teams so any upload you can mark > as "Team upload" and use a non-NMU versioning number. > > I would have expected "2016.05.09" in unstable and "2016.05.09~deb7u1" in > wheezy-security. I'll take that into account for future uploads. I supposed it was Ok to use nmu since nobody complain about it in previous versions. Cheers, Santiago
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature