[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: imagemagick

On Feb/12, Brian May wrote:
> >   - imagemagick in squeeze appears to only be vulnerable
> >     TEMP-0811308-B63DA1[0].
> This is five separate issues. See #811308. So does it make sense to ask
> for a separate CVE for each issue?

"Having a CVE associated to each security issue is definitely a plus, at
the very least for those issues serious enough to be fixed via a
DSA/DLA" stills stands :)



Reply to: