Am Sonntag, den 26.04.2015, 16:49 +0200 schrieb Joerg Jaspert: > On 13923 March 1977, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > >> But it would be nice if that wouldn't be necessary. > >> And it is unclear to me, why this key should be relevant for Squeeze. > > It's actually signed by both the wheezy key (46925553) and the jessie > > key (2B90D010); the latter is the one it's complaining about. At least > > on my squeeze system, the wheezy key is already in the apt trusted store > > (indeed, it was added to debian-archive-keyring in 2010.08.28+squeeze1). > > I assume that the intention was that systems with either the wheezy > > and/or jessie key would be able to verify the signature, but this doesn't > > seem to be the case, at least with the version of gpg/apt in squeeze. > > > Perhaps the FTP-masters need to drop the jessie signature for > > squeeze-lts? CCing them for their comments (together with a big thank you > > for the release work yesterday!) > > Its back to the way it was before - signed using the wheezy key. Thank you to all involved. I can confirm that the warning does not show up anymore. -- David Ayers - Team Austria Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE) [] (http://www.fsfe.org) Join the Fellowship of FSFE! [][][] (https://fsfe.org/join) Your donation powers our work! || (http://fsfe.org/donate)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part