On 13923 March 1977, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: >> But it would be nice if that wouldn't be necessary. >> And it is unclear to me, why this key should be relevant for Squeeze. > It's actually signed by both the wheezy key (46925553) and the jessie > key (2B90D010); the latter is the one it's complaining about. At least > on my squeeze system, the wheezy key is already in the apt trusted store > (indeed, it was added to debian-archive-keyring in 2010.08.28+squeeze1). > I assume that the intention was that systems with either the wheezy > and/or jessie key would be able to verify the signature, but this doesn't > seem to be the case, at least with the version of gpg/apt in squeeze. > Perhaps the FTP-masters need to drop the jessie signature for > squeeze-lts? CCing them for their comments (together with a big thank you > for the release work yesterday!) Its back to the way it was before - signed using the wheezy key. -- bye, Joerg Could you please add me to the mirrors@debian.org alias. I'm not receiving enough spam. -- Andrew Pollock
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature