On Sun, 2015-04-12 at 01:05 +0200, Bálint Réczey wrote: [...] > I assume this situation is not unique to Wireshark. What do you think, > what would be the best for the LTS project in Wireshark's case and > what is the general LTS strategy in similar cases? I think the best approach would be either: a. remove it from support and upload wireshark 1.8 to squeeze-backports if possible, or b. upload the backported wireshark 1.8 package to squeeze-lts Ben. -- Ben Hutchings compatible: Gracefully accepts erroneous data from any source
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part