[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: packages-to-support vs rails EOL



Hi Raphael,

On Mittwoch, 17. September 2014, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> you're referring here to a non-public file that lists the packages that
> (some) sponsors of http://www.freexian.com/services/debian-lts.html have
> installed.
> 
> Thus I don't believe that this list is the proper place to discuss this.

I agree, apologies. LTS is very new in many regards...
 
> That said, the file is auto-generated from list of installed packages and
> I don't see the harm of having it listed in that file. As long as the
> security support status of that packages is clear, it will never appear in
> dla-needed.txt and nobody will spend work time on an unsupported package.

ok, so the contents of the debian-security-support package define what we 
support or not. Good. Thanks for clarifying. (That wasn't clear to me as 
evident by this thread.)

Thanks!


cheers,
	Holger


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Reply to: