Re: security.debian.org vs debian-lts respository
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 16/06/14 22:00, Matt Palmer wrote:
> Hi Jelle,
>
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 12:08:24PM +0200, Jelle de Jong wrote:
>> So the only squeeze source I use is: deb
>> http://security.debian.org/ oldstable/updates main
>>
>> # apt-show-versions | fgrep /oldstable
>> linux-image-2.6.32-5-486/oldstable uptodate 2.6.32-48squeeze6
>>
>> What should I do to keep all my servers provided with a secured
>> 2.6 kernel, where will security updates for the kernel go to?
>
> You should add the LTS sources.list entry to your systems:
>
> deb http://http.debian.net/debian squeeze-lts main
>
> New kernel updates will be released to that repository (I'm
> working on one now).
>
> - Matt
Thank you for your reply! I will replace my oldstable/sqeeuze sources
with the squeeze-lts on all relevant systems.. +20...
I'm still wondering why the discussion was made to set-up a new
security system and new sources. Why not use the current
security.debian.org system add the check-support-status package and
just make clear that packages not listed don’t get security support
(this would have saved a lot of work for me and maybe others).
Kind regards,
Jelle de Jong
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
iJwEAQECAAYFAlOgPd8ACgkQ1WclBW9j5HkJMAP+MNaZA2LcJELHZf1EnoHuxFak
93pjThsmocMNjnNm3j6Wve7BRQSOybvWKxKsnKKIEc1fT608ZKfG6x9mHrVR7rr/
s9q5GaMIZDC0mhLavHCDc5KRX97ryIx5ZpuOutbi+xcNT5K8oLRkkSpo7AzkIRWw
CAx8A1ftjRhw74fga6w=
=JALN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: