Re: LSB status of sarge?
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:05:02 -0500, Jeff Licquia <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> I have it on good authority that the patch in the BTS is not
> sufficient. In particular, the problem seems to be that NPTL does not
> implement some pthread flags it should.
Right, at least duing pthread_create() and I suspect in other places as well.
> The solution, I'm told, is to update to NPTL 0.61, which is evidently
> difficult without upgrading to the most recent glibc. I have it on my
> task list to work on this problem, but I don't know what the timeframe
> will be.
Yes, we've tried taking nptl-0.61 and putting it straight into
2.3.2.ds1-16, but of course it didn't work...