Re: install conflicts
Hi, I want to create a live usb that is customized for my own purposes.
So live-build is the way to go, right?
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016, at 19:36, Michael . wrote:
> The original intent of live-wrapper was to replace live-build (because
> live-build didn't have some features that had been asked for) to build
> official Debian Live CDs.
> I do not think, someone correct me if I am wrong, live-wrapper was ever
> intended for non-official Debian or Debian derivative use. Live-build
> however was developed for both scenarios.
> Live-wrapper is still, very much, a work in progress. The 0.3 version
> simply did not work but now 0.4 is in Sid so it should be in testing
> (Stretch) within 10 days or so.
> If you just want to build official Debian images read the live-wrapper
> documentation https://debian-live.alioth.debian.org/live-wrapper-doc
>
> On 24 October 2016 at 12:08, <element79@emailengine.net> wrote:
>
> > Oh, thanks. Is live-wrapper replacing live-build? If so, maybe I'll
> > just use that instead.
> >
> > On Sun, Oct 23, 2016, at 17:40, Rui Bernardo wrote:
> > > Hi there,
> > >
> > > to have the live-build package installed you do not need to install the
> > > packages live-boot and live-config, those are installed by live-build
> > > when it creates a live system.
> > >
> > > Try just installing live-build only and no other package.
> > >
> > > On 23-10-2016 20:39, element79@emailengine.net wrote:
> > > > Dear debian-live,
> > > >
> > > > I have Debian 'Jessie' system that I installed with all defaults and
> > > > here is the output when I attempt to install live-build:
> > > >
> > > > # aptitude install live-build live-boot live-config
> > > > The following NEW packages will be installed:
> > > > debootstrap{a} live-boot live-boot-doc{a}
> > live-boot-initramfs-tools{a}
> > > > live-build live-config live-config-doc{a} live-config-sysvinit{a}
> > > > live-manual-html{a} live-tools{a} rsync{a} sudo{a} sysvinit-core{ab}
> > > > user-setup{a} uuid-runtime{a}
> > > > 0 packages upgraded, 15 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not
> > upgraded.
> > > > Need to get 2,686 kB of archives. After unpacking 14.7 MB will be used.
> > > > The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> > > > sysvinit-core : Conflicts: systemd-sysv but 215-17+deb8u5 is
> > installed.
> > > > systemd-sysv : Conflicts: sysvinit-core but 2.88dsf-59 is to be
> > > > installed.
> > > > The following actions will resolve these dependencies:
> > > >
> > > > Remove the following packages:
> > > > 1) brasero
> > > > 2) colord
> > > > 3) gdm3
> > > > 4) gnome
> > > > 5) gnome-bluetooth
> > > > 6) gnome-color-manager
> > > > 7) gnome-control-center
> > > > 8) gnome-core
> > > > 9) gnome-disk-utility
> > > > 10) gnome-music
> > > > 11) gnome-packagekit
> > > > 12) gnome-packagekit-session
> > > > 13) gnome-session
> > > > 14) gnome-settings-daemon
> > > > 15) gnome-shell
> > > > 16) gnome-shell-extension-weather
> > > > 17) gnome-shell-extensions
> > > > 18) gnome-sushi
> > > > 19) gnome-system-log
> > > > 20) gnome-user-share
> > > > 21) gvfs
> > > > 22) gvfs-backends
> > > > 23) gvfs-daemons
> > > > 24) gvfs-fuse
> > > > 25) libpam-systemd
> > > > 26) nautilus
> > > > 27) nautilus-sendto
> > > > 28) network-manager
> > > > 29) network-manager-gnome
> > > > 30) packagekit
> > > > 31) packagekit-tools
> > > > 32) policykit-1
> > > > 33) policykit-1-gnome
> > > > 34) systemd-sysv
> > > > 35) task-gnome-desktop
> > > > 36) udisks2
> > > >
> > > > Leave the following dependencies unresolved:
> > > > 37) argyll recommends libpam-systemd
> > > > 38) cheese recommends gvfs
> > > > 39) cheese recommends nautilus-sendto
> > > > 40) libcolord2 recommends colord
> > > > 41) libcolord-gtk1 recommends colord
> > > > 42) empathy recommends gvfs-backends
> > > > 43) evince recommends gvfs
> > > > 44) file-roller recommends gvfs
> > > > 45) gnome-calculator recommends gvfs
> > > > 46) gnome-control-center-data recommends gnome-control-center (>=
> > > > 1:3.14.2-3
> > > > 47) gnome-media recommends gnome-control-center
> > > > 48) gnome-online-accounts recommends gnome-control-center (>=
> > 3.6.1)
> > > > 49) gnome-session-bin recommends libpam-systemd
> > > > 50) gnome-shell recommends gnome-control-center
> > > > 51) gnome-shell recommends gdm3 (>= 3.10.0.1-3~)
> > > > 52) gnome-system-monitor recommends gvfs
> > > > 53) gnome-terminal recommends gvfs
> > > > 54) gvfs-common recommends gvfs
> > > > 55) gvfs-daemons recommends policykit-1-gnome
> > > > 56) hitori recommends gvfs
> > > > 57) metacity recommends gnome-session | x-session-manager
> > > > 58) mousetweaks recommends gnome-control-center
> > > > 59) mutter recommends gnome-session | x-session-manager
> > > > 60) nautilus recommends gvfs-backends
> > > > 61) nautilus-data recommends nautilus
> > > > 62) libpackagekit-glib2-18 recommends packagekit (= 1.0.1-2)
> > > > 63) rhythmbox recommends gvfs-backends
> > > > 64) rtkit recommends policykit-1
> > > > 65) synaptic recommends gksu | kdebase-bin | policykit-1
> > > > 66) systemd recommends libpam-systemd
> > > > 67) task-desktop recommends task-gnome-desktop | task-xfce-desktop
> > |
> > > > task-kd
> > > > 68) task-gnome-desktop recommends gnome
> > > > 69) task-gnome-desktop recommends network-manager-gnome
> > > > 70) totem-plugins recommends gnome-settings-daemon
> > > > 71) udisks2 recommends policykit-1
> > > > 72) upower recommends policykit-1
> > > > 73) vino recommends gvfs
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Accept this solution? [Y/n/q/?]
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
Reply to: