Re: install conflicts
Oh, thanks. Is live-wrapper replacing live-build? If so, maybe I'll
just use that instead.
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016, at 17:40, Rui Bernardo wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> to have the live-build package installed you do not need to install the
> packages live-boot and live-config, those are installed by live-build
> when it creates a live system.
>
> Try just installing live-build only and no other package.
>
> On 23-10-2016 20:39, element79@emailengine.net wrote:
> > Dear debian-live,
> >
> > I have Debian 'Jessie' system that I installed with all defaults and
> > here is the output when I attempt to install live-build:
> >
> > # aptitude install live-build live-boot live-config
> > The following NEW packages will be installed:
> > debootstrap{a} live-boot live-boot-doc{a} live-boot-initramfs-tools{a}
> > live-build live-config live-config-doc{a} live-config-sysvinit{a}
> > live-manual-html{a} live-tools{a} rsync{a} sudo{a} sysvinit-core{ab}
> > user-setup{a} uuid-runtime{a}
> > 0 packages upgraded, 15 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
> > Need to get 2,686 kB of archives. After unpacking 14.7 MB will be used.
> > The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> > sysvinit-core : Conflicts: systemd-sysv but 215-17+deb8u5 is installed.
> > systemd-sysv : Conflicts: sysvinit-core but 2.88dsf-59 is to be
> > installed.
> > The following actions will resolve these dependencies:
> >
> > Remove the following packages:
> > 1) brasero
> > 2) colord
> > 3) gdm3
> > 4) gnome
> > 5) gnome-bluetooth
> > 6) gnome-color-manager
> > 7) gnome-control-center
> > 8) gnome-core
> > 9) gnome-disk-utility
> > 10) gnome-music
> > 11) gnome-packagekit
> > 12) gnome-packagekit-session
> > 13) gnome-session
> > 14) gnome-settings-daemon
> > 15) gnome-shell
> > 16) gnome-shell-extension-weather
> > 17) gnome-shell-extensions
> > 18) gnome-sushi
> > 19) gnome-system-log
> > 20) gnome-user-share
> > 21) gvfs
> > 22) gvfs-backends
> > 23) gvfs-daemons
> > 24) gvfs-fuse
> > 25) libpam-systemd
> > 26) nautilus
> > 27) nautilus-sendto
> > 28) network-manager
> > 29) network-manager-gnome
> > 30) packagekit
> > 31) packagekit-tools
> > 32) policykit-1
> > 33) policykit-1-gnome
> > 34) systemd-sysv
> > 35) task-gnome-desktop
> > 36) udisks2
> >
> > Leave the following dependencies unresolved:
> > 37) argyll recommends libpam-systemd
> > 38) cheese recommends gvfs
> > 39) cheese recommends nautilus-sendto
> > 40) libcolord2 recommends colord
> > 41) libcolord-gtk1 recommends colord
> > 42) empathy recommends gvfs-backends
> > 43) evince recommends gvfs
> > 44) file-roller recommends gvfs
> > 45) gnome-calculator recommends gvfs
> > 46) gnome-control-center-data recommends gnome-control-center (>=
> > 1:3.14.2-3
> > 47) gnome-media recommends gnome-control-center
> > 48) gnome-online-accounts recommends gnome-control-center (>= 3.6.1)
> > 49) gnome-session-bin recommends libpam-systemd
> > 50) gnome-shell recommends gnome-control-center
> > 51) gnome-shell recommends gdm3 (>= 3.10.0.1-3~)
> > 52) gnome-system-monitor recommends gvfs
> > 53) gnome-terminal recommends gvfs
> > 54) gvfs-common recommends gvfs
> > 55) gvfs-daemons recommends policykit-1-gnome
> > 56) hitori recommends gvfs
> > 57) metacity recommends gnome-session | x-session-manager
> > 58) mousetweaks recommends gnome-control-center
> > 59) mutter recommends gnome-session | x-session-manager
> > 60) nautilus recommends gvfs-backends
> > 61) nautilus-data recommends nautilus
> > 62) libpackagekit-glib2-18 recommends packagekit (= 1.0.1-2)
> > 63) rhythmbox recommends gvfs-backends
> > 64) rtkit recommends policykit-1
> > 65) synaptic recommends gksu | kdebase-bin | policykit-1
> > 66) systemd recommends libpam-systemd
> > 67) task-desktop recommends task-gnome-desktop | task-xfce-desktop |
> > task-kd
> > 68) task-gnome-desktop recommends gnome
> > 69) task-gnome-desktop recommends network-manager-gnome
> > 70) totem-plugins recommends gnome-settings-daemon
> > 71) udisks2 recommends policykit-1
> > 72) upower recommends policykit-1
> > 73) vino recommends gvfs
> >
> >
> > Accept this solution? [Y/n/q/?]
> >
>
Reply to: