[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

RE: odd behavior



Log messages:

Begin: Running /scripts/live-realpremount ... done.
Begin: Mounting "/live/medium/live/filesystem.squashfs" on "//filesystem.squashfs" via "/dev/loop0" ... done.
mount: mounting /dev/sda on /live/persistence/sda failed: No such device
mount: mounting /dev/sdb on /live/persistence/sdb failed: Device or resource busy
mount: mounting /dev/sr0 on /live/persistence/sr0 failed: No such device
Warning: Skipping unsafe custom mount /lib: must be an absolute path containing neither the "." nor ".." special dirs, and cannot be "/lib", or "/lib/live" or any of its sub-directories.
umount: can't umount /live/overlay: Device or resource busy
done.
Begin: Configuring fstab ... done.
Begin: Preconfiguring networking ... done.
-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel Baumann [mailto:daniel.baumann@progress-technologies.net] 
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2013 11:39 AM
To: Debian-live mailing list
Subject: Re: odd behavior

On 06/13/2013 08:18 PM, Don Raikes wrote:
> When I try to boot off of the live key again, it fails. I have no one 
> available to read the screen to see what is being printed so can't 
> give any details on messages.

at which point does the boot fail? log files?

> This only started happening when I included the /lib union and /etc 
> lines in my persistence.conf file. Can these directories not be persisted?

they can.

what change excatly did you do to /lib and /etc? obviously one of these changes broke it, so you could bisect until you identified the guilty one..

-- 
Address:        Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern
Email:          daniel.baumann@progress-technologies.net
Internet:       http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-live-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: 51BA11B6.4080204@progress-technologies.net">http://lists.debian.org/51BA11B6.4080204@progress-technologies.net


Reply to: