[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

A reasonable use of a "live image"?



A reply in a recent thread {"Re: web front end: requested HDD, got hybrid-iso"} got me rethinking some past difficulties with using Live CD's in my environment.

Ben Armstrong wrote:> On 25/02/13 04:09 PM, Richard Nelson wrote:
Not sure.  I might mention that the hybrid iso image should be
compatible with usb keys as well.


Not merely compatible, but also because we switched to xorriso, you can
repartition the usb key after writing the image to the usb key and use
the remaining space (e.g. for persistence). So that scratches another
reason off the list for using hdd.

Ben

I have two problems to address:

I.  Creating media in a Windows(tm) *ONLY* environment.
A. The *ONLY* wide band access I have is using a Windows machine - read local public library. B. At home I've a laptop physically dedicated to my Linux experiments. At any time it can not be
       presumed to have an operable system.
C. My home Windows machine shall not dual boot Linux - how do you keep Linux newbie errors from corrupting must have primary machine, don't take the chance. D. I see the need for a "low pain" migration path from Windows.

Is there a native Windows method to accomplish the same thing as
  Quoting from http://blog.einval.com/2011/01/07
"
Instead of having to specially prepare USB sticks for the installer, you can now simply use dd to write the image straight to the raw stick, e.g.:
# dd if=debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso of=/dev/sdX
The USB stick should now boot directly, showing exactly the same bootup screen as if you'd written the image directly to a CD. Yay!
"

II. It would be convenient to have a Live Distro reside on a USB stick but have "persistence" and "swap" reside on a local harddrive. I would want the USB stick to wander between machines and possibly transport data files. Is this feasible?



Reply to: