Re: live-boot todo for wheezy
On 06/12/2012 03:31 AM, intrigeri wrote:
> Daniel, is that enough to put you on the right track to hunt this
> regression down?
not really. :)
first of all, i personally care about three usages:
* squeeze with unmodified[0] live-boot/live-config from sid
* squeeze plus backports of kernel, klibc, initramfs-tools, with
unmodified[0] live-boot/live-config from sid
* sid
wrt/ to initramfs-tools, the 0.106 version from sid will not work
properly on squeeze, backporting it needs a few adjustments, see:
http://sources.progress-linux.org/gitweb/?p=packages/initramfs-tools.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/progress-artax-backports
assuming you're using initramfs-tools 0.106 as a non-proper backport on
squeeze, this is a case which i don't care about (read: feel free to
provide patch, but i wont look into it).
second, i haven't tested squeeze (with or without kernel backports) with
live-boot/live-config from experimental yet, but i'll give it a go next
week when i've got some more time.
[0] unmodified as in 'rebuild on squeeze, but nothing changed by except
changelog'
--
Address: Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern
Email: daniel.baumann@progress-technologies.net
Internet: http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/
Reply to: