Re: Trying to build netboot iso with live-* from unstable
Have you included user-setup package?
Check its existence from your package list in build directory.
It's worth to try specifically include user-setup into build.
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 8:48 PM, Strickland, Carl
<carl.strickland@intel.com> wrote:
> Apt pinning the packages in unstable worked! So now I have the netboot system building and booting but it gets to a certain point in the boot process and starts reporting "Authentication failure". I assume it's trying to log in as a user with invalid credentials? Have you experienced this before?
>
>
> Thanks again :)
> Carl
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Baurzhan Muftakhidinov [mailto:baurthefirst@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, August 20, 2012 10:51 AM
> To: Strickland, Carl
> Cc: debian-live@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Trying to build netboot iso with live-* from unstable
>
> Well,
>
> Even though you have installed live-* packages from unstable to your build host, they still pull live-* packages from testing during the build process.
>
> What you can do is to get those live-* packages from unstable manually and put them into your config/packages.chroot directory.
>
> Hope this helps.
>
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 11:08 PM, Strickland, Carl <carl.strickland@intel.com> wrote:
>> Hi Ben,
>>
>>>Specifically, install live-build from sid on your build system and
>>>include sid's live-boot, live-config and their dependencies (the
>>>backends) in your config as described in live-manual.
>>
>> I'm not sure how I would include those packages in my config. I
>> installed the unstable packages using "apt-get -t unstable install
>> live-build live-config live-boot".
>>
>> Using "--volatile false" resolved the build issue. Thanks!
>> Unfortunately I'm still dealing with the netboot issue which I think
>> was supposed to have been resolved in unstable.
>>
>> It still appears that the system isn't bringing up a network interface
>> before trying to mount the NFS share. I can't imagine what I'm doing
>> wrong :(
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Carl
Reply to: