[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[OT] www.*



>>>>> Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-technologies.net> writes:
>>>>> On 08/15/2012 04:31 PM, Ivan Shmakov wrote:

[…]

 >> That being said, the “www.” DNS prefix is mostly useless nowadays,

 > it makes a few things more 'organized' if you have multiple things on
 > one domain (= multiple 3nd-level sub-domains);

	I wonder, how?

 > but other than that..  there's no harm in still 'supporting' the
 > legacy www. prefix too.

	Other than wasting four octets each time the site is referenced?
	(If one happens to use an example.org → www.example.org HTTP
	redirection, not a reverse one; some sites use neither and
	support both equally, though.)

	I have no reason to insist on this, however.  Still a thing to
	think of.

-- 
FSF associate member #7257	http://sf-day.org/


Reply to: