Re: Why are the Squeeze images so much larger?

To: Debian Live <debian-live@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Why are the Squeeze images so much larger?
From: Phil Calvert <pcalvert@rocketmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 07:32:59 -0800 (PST)
Message-id: <[🔎] 461472.44450.qm@web32004.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 4D5121EF.1030502@progress-technologies.net>

--- On Tue, 2/8/11, Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-technologies.net> wrote:
> if you need a cd sized image, you can always build one
> yourself, see the
> live-manual at http://live.debian.net/manual/ for more
> information.

Indeed, that is the solution, and it is simpler than I expected. I just built a Squeeze LXDE hybrid ISO, and the size is 462M. The prebuilt LXDE image is 750M, and I was not expecting to see such a large difference.

Phil

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why are the Squeeze images so much larger?
  - From: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-technologies.net>

References:
- Re: Why are the Squeeze images so much larger?
  - From: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-technologies.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Why are the Squeeze images so much larger?
Next by Date: Bug#544192: Building a case for the need for a debian-live pseudopackage
Previous by thread: Re: Why are the Squeeze images so much larger?
Next by thread: Re: Why are the Squeeze images so much larger?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread