[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

building root filesystem image killed



Dear list!

My first try to build a ISO-image failed like this:

P: Begin building root filesystem image...
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Suggested packages:
  squashfs-source
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  squashfs-tools
0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 92.9kB of archives.
After this operation, 238kB of additional disk space will be used.
Get:1 http://ftp.us.debian.org lenny/main squashfs-tools 1:3.3-7 [92.9kB]
Fetched 92.9kB in 3s (23.5kB/s)
Selecting previously deselected package squashfs-tools.
(Reading database ... 75145 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking squashfs-tools (from .../squashfs-tools_1%3a3.3-7_i386.deb) ...
Processing triggers for man-db ...
Setting up squashfs-tools (1:3.3-7) ...
Parallel mksquashfs: Using 1 processor
Creating little endian 3.1 filesystem on filesystem.squashfs, block size 131072.
[=======                                                                                      ]  6183/72751   8%/usr/share/live-helper/functions/chroot.sh: line 13: 11939 Killed                  ${LH_ROOT_COMMAND} chroot chroot /usr/bin/env -i HOME="/root" PATH="/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin" TERM="${TERM}" ftp_proxy="${LH_APT_FTP_PROXY}" http_proxy="${LH_APT_HTTP_PROXY}" DEBIAN_FRONTEND="${LH_DEBCONF_FRONTEND}" DEBIAN_PRIORITY="${LH_DEBCONF_PRIORITY}" DEBCONF_NOWARNINGS="${LH_DEBCONF_NOWARNINGS}" XORG_CONFIG="custom" ${COMMANDS}
# 

This box has not much RAM (40 MB) and a swap partition of 100MB, might
that be why the process was killed?

Suppose I increase the swap available to the OS, can I then retry only
the last step (the step that failed above), or do I have to restart
the lh_build process from the beginning?

-- 
Hans Ekbrand (http://sociologi.cjb.net) <hans@sociologi.cjb.net>
A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
Q. Why is top posting bad?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: