Default user decisions
Alle Sunday 27 April 2008, Daniel Baumann ha scritto:
> The only other live system I know remotely, uses username 'ubuntu' and
> no password.
> That made me curious what others think. So, what do *you* guys think?
> Should it be left as is? Or do you have other preferences? How do other
> live systems do it?
ssh wise, Ubuntu's choice is more secure, because it disallows ssh logins if
the local console user did not provide a new password.
I think that using a NULL password like ubuntu do and providing both an
interactive way to change it and a boot parameter could be the way I would
like to have the user password managed.
That way we could have a more secure default image approach, a secure personal
use approach and the ability to set a password easely at build time.
--
ESC:wq
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-live-devel/attachments/20080501/c5eb8e60/attachment.pgp
Reply to: