Rescue flavor improvements

Subject: Rescue flavor improvements
From: daniel at debian.org (Daniel Baumann)
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 17:29:43 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 4811F8E7.4040606@debian.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20080425135735.GD4853@debian-ba.org>
References: <[🔎] 20080424101009.GE22208@debian-ba.org> <[🔎] 87wsmndpqq.fsf@neumann.lab.ossystems.com.br> <[🔎] 20080424195019.GF22208@debian-ba.org> <[🔎] 55c223960804250129o71a0e429hea5f085885918ee8@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 20080425135735.GD4853@debian-ba.org>

Tiago Bortoletto Vaz wrote:
> I think we should split the rescue lists in -common, -stable, -testing,
> maybe even for archs (-i386, -amd64 etc).

yep; note that always and everywhere, the codenames (etch, lenny, sid
etc.) should be used rather than the suites (stable, testing, unstable
etc.).

-- 
Address:        Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email:          daniel.baumann at panthera-systems.net
Internet:       http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/

Reply to:

References:
- Rescue flavor improvements
  - From: tiago at debian-ba.org (Tiago Bortoletto Vaz)
- Rescue flavor improvements
  - From: otavio at debian.org (Otavio Salvador)
- Rescue flavor improvements
  - From: tiago at debian-ba.org (Tiago Bortoletto Vaz)
- Rescue flavor improvements
  - From: r.alex.owen at gmail.com (Alex Owen)
- Rescue flavor improvements
  - From: tiago at debian-ba.org (Tiago Bortoletto Vaz)

Prev by Date: Rescue flavor improvements
Next by Date: Rescue flavor improvements
Previous by thread: Rescue flavor improvements
Next by thread: Rescue flavor improvements
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread