[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/linux-image-2.6.22-3-686_2.6.22-6_i386.deb (--unpack):

El Friday 30 November 2007 15:05:07 Daniel Baumann escribi?:
> Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > No, that (suck error message) is from the kernel preinst regarding
> > some debconf prompt.  It's not clear to me what the cause or right
> > solution is (preseeding, setting environment variables, ...).
> he is hiding the most important information:
> 23:22:39 < H> Package linux-image-2.6.22-3-686 is not installed.
> 23:23:09 < H> but i use amd64 ...
> 23:24:46 < H> so i guess its on the chroot
> 23:25:18 < H> but i did not changed that sources or packages neither.
> H, please just fix your config and be done with it...

this was the paste i posted on the irc:

I did understood the cause of the problem, or thats what i think.

Its not the config because i did 3 or 4 diferent dvds with that config.

we read there this:
The following packages are unused and will be REMOVED:
  aufs-modules-2.6.22-2-686 libapertium-1.0-0 liblttoolbox-1.0-0 
The following NEW packages will be automatically installed:
  acpi-support-base aufs-modules-2.6.22-3-686 
anyway, the squashfs-modules-2.6.22-3-686 depends on 
linux-modules-2.6.22-3-686 so the dependency on the new kernel is twice.

Live-helpers decided to delete the used aufs-modules-2.6.22-2-686  and install 
the new one aufs-modules-2.6.22-3-686  but that was not possible because it 
has instaled the linux-image-2.6.22-3-686_2.6.22-6_i386.deb  and  
acpi-support-base aufs-modules-2.6.22-3-686  depends on 
linux-image-2.6.22-3-686 wich was not able to install.

i guess its not possible for build step to change the kernel of the chroot and 
that was the problem. If im not wrong.

I tried to make    lh_clean all && lh_build and it worked.
It put that new kernel, installed the new aufs-modules and squashfs-modules 
and now its working.

Anyway, thanks for the help.

If im still wrong, please helpme to know it.


Ren? M?rou

Reply to: