Hi folks! I discovered that Linitan does not recognize license expressions in stand-alone license paragraphs in a d/copyright file. They seem not to be prohibited by DEP-5 as far as I can tell. Is it really so or do I read the spec wrong? https://dep-team.pages.debian.net/deps/dep5/#stand-alone-license-paragraph I found that recent Linitan emits the missing-license-paragraph-in-dep5- copyright tag for my package "rlottie" despite it contains a paragraph with a compound header "License: MPL-1.1 or GPL-2.0 or LGPL-2.1". I recall our linter was not triggering this tag earlier. https://sources.debian.org/src/rlottie/0.1%2Bdfsg-2/debian/copyright/#L254 I would like to discuss this case before filing a bug report or adding an override or changing the d/copyright file. Is this list an appropriate place?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part