debian-lint-maint Feb 2022 by author

[previous page]

Page 1 of 1

[next page]

[Thread Index] [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Alexandre Ghiti

Bug#1006261: Fix Feb 22
Bug#1006261: "ltrans.o: relocation R_X86_64_32 against `.rodata.str1.1' can not be used when making a shared object" Feb 22

Andrey Rahmatullin

Bug#1004746: lintian: provide a check for Python package version numbers validity Feb 01

Axel Beckert

Bug#1006556: lintian: copyright-refers-to-versionless-license-file and copyright-refers-to-symlink-license seem to be about the same issue Feb 27

Ben Finney

Chris Lamb

Bug#1005049: lintian: incorrect leading comma in "sub oxford_enumeration" Feb 06

Daniele Forsi

Bug#1005046: lintian: [false positive] very-long-line-length-in-source-file for pictures and sounds Feb 05

Debian Bug Tracking System

Debian FTP Masters

emacs-lintian_0.1.1_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable Feb 22
Processing of emacs-lintian_0.1.1_source.changes Feb 22
emacs-lintian_0.1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable, unstable Feb 12

duck

Bug#1005326: no-code-sections triggered on non-ELF files Feb 11

Emmanuel Bourg

Re: Bug#1005762: marked as pending in lintian Feb 21
Bug#1005762: marked as pending in lintian Feb 15
Bug#1005762: lintian: Update known Java version up to 19 Feb 14

Felix Lechner

Bug#1005049: lintian: incorrect leading comma in "sub oxford_enumeration" Feb 06
Bug#1005326: no-code-sections triggered on non-ELF files Feb 11
Bug#1006348: lintian: Tag improbable-bug-number-in-closes condition considers 7-digit bug numbers improbable Feb 24
Re: Question about a potential false positive error Feb 11
Re: Bug#1005762: marked as pending in lintian Feb 15
Bug#1005200: lintian: prefer-uscan-symlink should to single maintainer packages at most Feb 08
Linitian release patterns Feb 20
Re: Question about a potential false positive error Feb 10
Re: Question about a potential false positive error Feb 10

Foesco

Febrero 2022 Feb 02

Grupo Foesco

Info Foesco Feb 11
Consulta Foesco Feb 17

Julian Gilbey

Bug#1004746: lintian: provide a check for Python package version numbers validity Feb 01
Bug#1005043: lintian: check that Python version numbers are not 0.0.0 Feb 07
Bug#1005043: lintian: check that Python version numbers are not 0.0.0 Feb 06
Bug#1005043: lintian: check that Python version numbers are not 0.0.0 Feb 05

Kristian Kiel

Die Chronomaster Anniversary ist dieses Valentinstag zur Verfügung Feb 03

Luis Fernandez

Re: Mutual Investment Proposal Feb 26

Mario Blättermann

Bug#1006390: Incorrect entry in SEE ALSO section of lintian(1) Feb 24

Mattia Rizzolo

Bug#1005200: lintian: prefer-uscan-symlink should to single maintainer packages at most Feb 11

Russ Allbery

Re: Question about a potential false positive error Feb 10

Sandro Tosi

Bug#1005043: lintian: check that Python version numbers are not 0.0.0 Feb 06
Bug#1005043: lintian: check that Python version numbers are not 0.0.0 Feb 05

Scott Kitterman

Bug#1005184: lintian: package-does-not-install-examples should not look in tests Feb 08
Bug#1005184: marked as pending in lintian Feb 08
Bug#1005200: lintian: prefer-uscan-symlink should to single maintainer packages at most Feb 08

S.Ho

Read Mutual Benefits. Feb 06

Sofortige Zustellung

Dein MEDIAMARKT-Gutschein wartet auf dich, noch interessiert? Feb 01

Stefano Rivera

Bug#1005043: lintian: check that Python version numbers are not 0.0.0 Feb 06

Stephen Kitt

Bug#1005326: no-code-sections triggered on non-ELF files Feb 27

Troy Heber

Re: Question about a potential false positive error Feb 11
Question about a potential false positive error Feb 10

Martin-Éric Racine

Bug#1006482: lintian: non-standard-dir-in-var var/db/ Feb 26

The last update was on 20:55 GMT Sun Feb 27. There are 59 messages. Page 1 of 1.

[previous month]

[first page]

[previous page]

Page 1 of 1

[next page]

[last page]

[next month]

[Thread Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Mail converted by MHonArc