control: clone -1 -2 control: reassign -2 debian-policy control: retitle -2 Don't require Standards-Version field when only udebs Hello, On Thu 12 Aug 2021 at 11:47PM +02, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name> (2021-08-12): >> On Tue 27 Jul 2021 at 08:41AM -06, Sam Hartman wrote: >> >> > >> > So, it seems fairly obvious to me that Standards-Version is important >> > for packages that produce both debs and udebs. >> > I'm assuming the focus of our discussion then is on source packages that >> > only produce udebs. >> > Have I got that right? >> > >> > By definition, most of the policy that affects binary packages does not >> > inherently apply to udebs. As I understand it, that's kind of the point >> > of udebs. >> >> Would you agree with this? You're only asking to stop seeing warnings >> about S-V for source packages which produce only udebs? > > Yes, that looks good to me: source packages (also) producing debs would > deserve a rightful nag. I believe that we failed to consider udebs when we made the change which made S-V mandatory. I propose we remove the requirement for S-V in udebs and source packages producing only udebs, until and unless someone provides a positive argument why S-V ought to be mandatory in these cases too. (Cloning the bug but not writing a patch right now; someone else should feel free to.) -- Sean Whitton
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature