Hi Sean, Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name> (2021-08-12): > On Tue 27 Jul 2021 at 08:41AM -06, Sam Hartman wrote: > > >>>>>> "Cyril" == Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> writes: > > > > Cyril> Hi, Felix Lechner <felix.lechner@lease-up.com> (2021-07-26): > > > > Cyril> cc-ing debian-policy@ for some possible feedback. > > > > Cyril> I'm not sure why we should be spending time tracking down > > Cyril> Policy changes in (source for) udeb packages… so adding then > > Cyril> updating this field to all our packages doesn't seem to do us > > Cyril> any good. > > > > So, it seems fairly obvious to me that Standards-Version is important > > for packages that produce both debs and udebs. > > I'm assuming the focus of our discussion then is on source packages that > > only produce udebs. > > Have I got that right? > > > > By definition, most of the policy that affects binary packages does not > > inherently apply to udebs. As I understand it, that's kind of the point > > of udebs. > > Would you agree with this? You're only asking to stop seeing warnings > about S-V for source packages which produce only udebs? Yes, that looks good to me: source packages (also) producing debs would deserve a rightful nag. Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois (kibi@debian.org) <https://debamax.com/> D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature