On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 10:17:04PM -0000, Chris Lamb wrote: >... > For starters, if Lintian complained about unsigned .buildinfo files it > would seem sensible to warn about unsigned .changes "first", >... The logical logical order is that lintian runs before signing, signing potentially broken packages feels wrong. dput already rejects unswigned changes, and this is the right place for the check. cu Adrian