Hi Felix, * Felix Lechner [Mon Nov 16, 2020 at 02:36:20PM -0800]: > On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 2:24 PM Michael Prokop <mika@debian.org> wrote: > > ... then lintian 2.101.0 + 2.101.0~bpo10+1 fails hard with: > If you are using backports, why not switch your profile over to: > Disable-Tags: no-nmu-in-changelog > I think that might work on both 2.101.0 + 2.101.0~bpo10+1. 2.101.0 + 2.101.0~bpo10+1 are pretty much the same version. ;) But "Disable-Tags: no-nmu-in-changelog" then fails hard with e.g. lintian v2.15.0 from Debian/buster, due to: | Unknown tag "no-nmu-in-changelog" in profile "example/main" at /usr/share/perl5/Lintian/Profile.pm line 474. Quoting myself from my initial bugreport: | I'm all for cleaning up, though it would be nice to have backwards | compatibility for such changes. Otherwise it's impossible to use | such a lintian profile on e.g. buster and bullseye systems at the | same time. regards -mika-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature