Package: lintian Version: 2.101.0 Severity: important Hi, using the following lintian profile: ,---- [ /etc/lintian/profiles/example or ~/.lintian/profiles/example/main.profile ] | Profile: example/main | Extends: debian/main | Disable-Tags: changelog-should-mention-nmu `---- ... then lintian 2.101.0 + 2.101.0~bpo10+1 fails hard with: ,---- [ example run ] | % lintian --profile=example example_0.42.dsc | Unknown tags in profile example/main: changelog-should-mention-nmu at /usr/share/lintian/bin/../lib/Lintian/Profile.pm line 612. | Lintian::Profile::read_profile(Lintian::Profile=HASH(0x558b15a7e538), "example") called at /usr/share/lintian/bin/../lib/Lintian/Profile.pm line 283 | Lintian::Profile::load(Lintian::Profile=HASH(0x558b15a7e538), "example", ARRAY(0x558b15b0f4c8), HASH(0x558b15b7c6b0)) called at /usr/bin/lintian line 614 | % echo $? | 255 `---- AFAICT this issue is caused by the commit: | "Mass-rename tags for consistency according to the RFC, with some latitude. (Closes: #922544)" | commit bab2ca64e407e81bbcf625ad8ae945f60f7dcffa | https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/-/commit/bab2ca64e407e81bbcf625ad8ae945f60f7dcffa I'm all for cleaning up, though it would be nice to have backwards compatibility for such changes. Otherwise it's impossible to use such a lintian profile on e.g. buster and bullseye systems at the same time. regards -mika-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature