Processed: Re: Bug#926334: lintian: Does the SafeSEH check make sense for Mono/.NET DLLs?

To: Felix Lechner <felix.lechner@lease-up.com>
Cc: lintian-maint@debian.org
Subject: Processed: Re: Bug#926334: lintian: Does the SafeSEH check make sense for Mono/.NET DLLs?
From: "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org>
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2019 17:12:05 +0000
Message-id: <[🔎] handler.s.B926334.155431137631370.transcript@bugs.debian.org>
References: <[🔎] CAFHYt54NZuvkBxPMhZQkGxaarohT1F0707NCFeajwzY-gKHcPg@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 87pnq39hoq.fsf@msgid.hilluzination.de>

Processing control commands:

> tags 926334 moreinfo
Bug #926334 [lintian] lintian: Does the SafeSEH check make sense for Mono/.NET DLLs?
Added tag(s) moreinfo.

-- 
926334: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=926334
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

Reply to:

References:
- Bug#926334: lintian: Does the SafeSEH check make sense for Mono/.NET DLLs?
  - From: Felix Lechner <felix.lechner@lease-up.com>
- Bug#926334: lintian: Does the SafeSEH check make sense for Mono/.NET DLLs?
  - From: Hilko Bengen <bengen@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Processed: Bug #926334 in lintian marked as pending
Next by Date: [Git][lintian/lintian][master] 43 commits: Add test selector 'skeleton:' to effectively select the old test suites.
Previous by thread: Processed: Bug #926334 in lintian marked as pending
Next by thread: Bug#926334: marked as done (lintian: Does the SafeSEH check make sense for Mono/.NET DLLs?)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread