Processed: Bug #926334 in lintian marked as pending

To: Chris Lamb <lamby@debian.org>
Cc: lintian-maint@debian.org
Subject: Processed: Bug #926334 in lintian marked as pending
From: "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org>
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2019 17:12:07 +0000
Message-id: <[🔎] handler.s.U926334.155431132331073.transcript@bugs.debian.org>
References: <5ca4e89a3aba8_38822ad0893b025c97122@godard.mail> <[🔎] 87pnq39hoq.fsf@msgid.hilluzination.de>

Processing control commands:

> tag -1 pending
Bug #926334 [lintian] lintian: Does the SafeSEH check make sense for Mono/.NET DLLs?
Added tag(s) pending.

-- 
926334: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=926334
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

Reply to:

References:
- Bug#926334: lintian: Does the SafeSEH check make sense for Mono/.NET DLLs?
  - From: Hilko Bengen <bengen@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Bug#926334: lintian: Does the SafeSEH check make sense for Mono/.NET DLLs?
Next by Date: Processed: Re: Bug#926334: lintian: Does the SafeSEH check make sense for Mono/.NET DLLs?
Previous by thread: Bug#926334: lintian: Does the SafeSEH check make sense for Mono/.NET DLLs?
Next by thread: Processed: Re: Bug#926334: lintian: Does the SafeSEH check make sense for Mono/.NET DLLs?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread