On Sun, 09 Sep 2018 10:20:51 +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: > > Since we're re-wording, "a special exception" doesn't seem quite right > > to me. I'm not sure what rule being discussed it is an exception > > to. Perhaps "in particular". > Makes sense. I'll change "particular" and "should" immediately but keep > this bug report open, pending: Sounds both good to me, thanks. > > What about a seperate tag for #!/usr/bin/env ? The wording could be more > > precise, and it does seem like the current tag conflates two (somewhat > > related, but distinct) issues, > Let's await the Perl team. Can I leave this with you to poke them into > responding here? Like Chris, I don't care alot if it's an E or a W. It seemed to me that there was broad consensus in the policy bug that '#!/usr/bin/env perl' _is_ wrong, just that a "must" would have made too many packages insta-buggy. So from my POV, keeping the severity (and keeping just one tag) is fine. Cheers, gregor -- .''`. https://info.comodo.priv.at -- Debian Developer https://www.debian.org : :' : OpenPGP fingerprint D1E1 316E 93A7 60A8 104D 85FA BB3A 6801 8649 AA06 `. `' Member VIBE!AT & SPI Inc. -- Supporter Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: Little Richard: Lucille
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital Signature